Pages

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Shanghai 2010 World Expo--the largest in history


Chinese President Hu Jintao declares the opening of the Shanghai World Expo during the Expo opening ceremony in Shanghai, east China, on April 30, 2010. (Xinhua/Fan Rujun)

SHANGHAI, April 30 (Xinhua) -- The Shanghai World Expo has got underway Friday evening with a dazzling display of artistic performances, fancy fireworks and high technologies at the opening ceremony.
After years of planning and preparation, the ceremony, featuring indoor performances and outdoor celebrations, began at around 20:00 in the Expo Culture Center of the Expo park, which spreads across 5.28 square kilometers along both sides of the Huangpu River.Full story
President Hu promises "unforgettable" Shanghai Expo to bridge China, the world
SHANGHAI, April 30 (Xinhua) -- Chinese President Hu Jintao on Friday voiced confidence of Shanghai hosting an "unforgettable" World Expo, which he said would bridge China and the world.
Hu addressed a welcoming dinner for foreign dignitaries who would attend the opening ceremony of the Shanghai Expo on Friday evening.Full story

Chinese vice premier says World Expo to usher in new ways of life
SHANGHAI, April 30 (Xinhua) -- Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan said Friday the upcoming Shanghai World Expo, with the theme of "Better City, Better Life," would usher in new ways of life for people and contribute to the promotion of harmony among mankind, cities and nature.
Wang, who heads the expo organizing committee, said at the expo opening ceremony that the event would serve as a platform for people worldwide to innovate, cooperate and communicate.Full story
SHANGHAI, April 30 (Xinhua) -- The gaze of the world is once more fixed upon China -- this time its financial hub of Shanghai -- two years after Beijing impressed the world with a memorable Olympic Games.
An expected 70 million visitors from both home and abroad will see a kaleidoscope of landmarks, ideas and visions embodying the theme of the Expo: Better City, Better Life.Full story
SHANGHAI, April 30 (Xinhua) -- The opening ceremony of the 2010 World Expo in Shanghai is to kick off at the Expo Park on Friday night in good weather, local meteorological authorities said.
The weather during the daytime Friday, under the control of high atmospheric pressure, will continue to be clear with enough sunshine and a maximum temperature of 25 degrees Celsius in the downtown, according to the Shanghai Meteorological Bureau.Full story
SHANGHAI, April 30 (Xinhua) -- Flags of 189 nations and 57 international organizations were hoisted Friday morning in the Shanghai World Expo venues, along with the World Expo Bureau flag and the Shanghai Expo flag, signaling the formal entry of all participants.
After the ceremony held at 8:30 a.m. in front of the China Pavilion, all flags will fly over the Expo venue in next 184 days of the Shanghai World Expo.Full story

Shanghai World Expo park opens to public



English.news.cn

The opening ceremony of the site of World Expo 2010 is held in Shanghai on May 1, 2010. (Xinhua/Ding Lin)

The opening ceremony of the site of World Expo 2010 is held in Shanghai on May 1, 2010. (Xinhua/Ding Lin)

SHANGHAI, May 1 (Xinhua) -- The Shanghai World Expo formally opened its door to the highly avid public Saturday morning after years of planning and preparation.
Visitors, from home and abroad, have thronged to the gates of the Expo park, receiving security checks in long queues. More than 350,000 tickets have been sold or distributed for the opening day, organizers said.
Ge Ning, an executive of a sci-tech company in neighboring Jiangsu Province, was among the first to enter the park.
"I'm here to see new inventions concerning science, technology, environmental protection, and energy," he said. The United States Pavilion and the exotic pavilions of African countries are also on his list.
"I might only be able to visit five pavilions today," he said, wowing the crowds around him.
Top Chinese political advisor Jia Qinglin and International Exhibitions Bureau President Jean-Pierre Lafon activated the opening device together at a commencement ceremony.
The Expo, carrying a theme of "Better City, Better Life", reflects the crystallization of wisdom about urban construction and vision of a better future life, Jia, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, said while addressing the ceremony.
In his speech, Jia expressed gratitude to all participants, the BIE and those who toiled for the preparation for the grand event.
In the Expo, visitors could enjoy pavilions with original design, explore scientific and technological progress, enjoy various cultural events, and take part in symposiums to fully experience the mankind's pursue for development of civilization, he said.
BIE Secretary Teneral Vicente Gonzalea Loscertales said the Shanghai World Expo would be "the most splendid and unforgettable" and would help the world better understand the present, have a glimpse into the future and strengthen cooperation between countries and organizations.
The Expo is "a celebration of human achievements with the goal of inspiring present and future generations to pursue not only the ideals, but also the actions for 'Better City, Better Life'," Loscertales said.
The six-month Expo will "not only educate, entertain and fascinate visitors, but will spark the energies to build the cities of the future on some of its foundations," he said.
Covering an area of 5.28 square kilometers along both sides of the Huangpu River, a tributary of the Yangtze River, the Expo is expected to attract 70 million visitors from home and abroad. 
Related:

Commencement ceremony of Shanghai World Expo starts
SHANGHAI, May 1 (Xinhua) -- The commencement ceremony of the Shanghai World Expo park starts at the Expo Center Saturday morning.
The park covers an area of 5.28 square kilometers along both sides of the Huangpu River, a tributary of the Yangtze River.Full story

World joins China in celebrating Shanghai World Expo opening
BEIJING, April 30 (Xinhua) -- With fireworks lighting up the night's sky and electrifying the city, the six-month 2010 Shanghai World Expo opened Friday night to music and dances in a 90-minute inauguration ceremony.
It was destined to be a moment crowded with glamour and splendor when China's metropolis of Shanghai was chosen to host the 41st World Expo almost eight years ago.Full story

EU Leaders Confident Greece Bailout Will Succeed

The head of the European Commission says he is confident an emergency aid package will keep Greece's crippling debt crisis from further threatening the financial health of other EU nations.

Speaking at a press conference in Beijing Friday, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said measures to contain the crisis will be in place in the coming days.

Officials say a bailout being discussed with the EU and International Monetary Fund will likely cost about $160 billion, and will require Greece to drastically slash its deficit by 2011.

Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou told parliament Friday the cutbacks are a "patriotic responsibility" that must be done without regard to political cost.

Greek union officials said the proposed deal could cause extreme hardship.

Police fired tear gas on protesters outside of Greece's finance ministry late Thursday as hundreds gathered to rally against the austerity measures.

More protests are planned on Labor Day, which is on Saturday, while unions have called for a general strike on May 5.

Politicians and investors are worried that economic problems could spread if Greece fails to pay back its debt.  Those concerns grew earlier this week, when a key credit rating agency, Standard and Poor's, downgraded its credit ratings of Greece, Portugal and Spain.

Greece faces a May 19 deadline for servicing a portion of its debt.

Any Greek bailout will require the approval of other euro zone members, and the plan has met political opposition in Germany.

European officials, including the European Commission's top economic official Ollie Rehn, have been pressing Germany to support the rescue, saying the package is needed to "safeguard financial stability in Europe."

European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet also said the bailout was needed to help give Europe a "strong sense of direction" to guide the economy.

Standard and Poor's Chief Economist David Wyss told the Associated Press Thursday that the biggest threat from the Greek debt crisis is panic among investors.

Wyss said if people fear Greece will default, they will also worry Portugal will default and then "they will panic about everything."

(VOA News 30 April 2010)

Union Members, Community Activists Stage 'March on Wall Street'

Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Protestors pass a sculpture of a Bull while marching through the financial district, Thursday, April 29, 2010, in New York. Protestors are calling for Wall Street accountability, the creation of good jobs, and an end to predatory lending practices.

Thousands of union members and community activists rallied in downtown New York City Thursday afternoon for what was billed as a March on Wall Street, led by the the presidents of the NAACP and the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor group. They carried signs and chanted populist slogans as they marched down Broadway past Wall Street an hour after the markets had closed for the day.

Several thousand union members and activists rallied near City Hall, and then marched through the financial district to protest unemployment and the taxpayer-funded rescue of Wall Street and big banks.

The demonstration was organized by community groups and the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor group, representing about 11 million workers. The AFL-CIO is urging Congress to create a $900 billion government jobs program and to tax securities trades and bankers' bonuses to pay for it.  Business groups oppose the tax, saying it would hurt the economy.

The protesters carried signs saying, "Good Jobs Now, "Hold Banks Accountable," and "Save Our Homes." They chanted, "Main Street - Not Wall street." A few were dressed as pirates - or held cardboard caricatures of capitalists in top hats, with the faces of pigs.

Protester Teddy Aravidis, an electrician, says he has been out of work for five months. "You know, I'm a person that has a mortgage, has a family, has to live - banks are getting richer from what I see, and we're just ending up getting poorer and poorer. I just hope things are going to turn around real quick," he said.

Darwin Petrone, an operating engineer, said he has been jobless for three months. "It's terrible, probably one of the worst feelings because you lost part of your identity with your job," he said.

Lee Eck of Albany was there with other members of the painters and glaziers union from upstate New York. "This year is the worst year we've seen since the early 80s. we have upwards of 7.7 unemployment in our area, Albany, and we've seen nothing like this for years," he said.

City University English professor Paulette Henderson said her job is safe, but she was marching to stand up for others. "There's just been a huge inequality in this country for a long time, the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting desperate, and the middle class is evaporating," she said.

The rally ended at a symbol of Wall Street prosperity - the bronze bull a few blocks from the American Stock Exchange. Standing next it, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said the day had been a success.  "Wall Street got the message: No more business as usual. They destroyed 11 million jobs, they're going to pay for those 11 million jobs," he said.

Earlier in the day, more than 100 protesters entered a building in midtown Manhattan where the banking company JP Morgan Chase has offices. They chanted, "Bust up big banks!" and "People Power," before police escorted them outside.  They then pushed into another building lobby nearby where the Wells Fargo and Wachovia bank have offices,  reportedly delivering a letter of demands before leaving.

US Economy Grows by 3.2 Percent

President Barack Obama, accompanied by small business employers and employees,  speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House, 30 Apr 2010
Photo: AP
President Barack Obama, accompanied by small business employers and employees, speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House, 30 Apr 2010


The U.S. economy grew in the first three months of this year, but more slowly than at the end of last year. President Barack Obama is encouraged by the news.

U.S. consumer spending saw its biggest increase in three years in the first three months of 2010, which drove the country's overall economy to its third consecutive quarter of growth.

However, the Commerce Department's estimate of 3.2-percent economic growth from January through March is weaker than the 5.6-percent growth from last October through December.

But President Obama says three consecutive quarters of growth are a good sign, after four straight quarters of shrinkage.

"After the single biggest economic crisis in our lifetimes, we are heading in the right direction," said President Obama. "We are moving forward.  Our economy is stronger.  That economic heartbeat is growing stronger."

The president says the first-quarter growth is "an important milepost" in the nation's economic recovery.  But he acknowledges that unemployment is still high at 9.7 percent, and after visiting the hard-hit Midwest this week, he says more work lies ahead.

"For millions of Americans, our friends, neighbors and fellow citizens ready and willing to get back to work, 'You are hired' is the only economic news they are waiting to hear," said Mr. Obama.

But Mr. Obama says the rebounding economy will make more hiring possible.

"And that growth has been a condition for job growth," said the president. "The economy that was losing jobs a year ago is creating jobs today."

The Commerce Department report shows that Americans have been spending more lately on home furnishings, appliances, recreational goods, clothing, and meals at restaurants.

But analysts expect unemployment to stay high in the coming months, and an Associated Press poll says only 21 percent of Americans believe the economy is in good condition.


Related Articles

Obama Calls for Campaign Finance Reforms

VOA News 01 May 2010

President Barack Obama, 29 Apr 2010 (file photo)
Photo: AP
President Barack Obama, 29 Apr 2010 (file photo)

U.S. President Barack Obama is calling for reforms to counter a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows corporations to spend unlimited money in U.S. political campaigns.

In his weekly address, Mr. Obama said Congress should consider new measures that prevent companies and other special interests from, in his words, "gaining even more clout in Washington."

Mr. Obama proposed reforms that force political campaign committees to reveal their sources of funding.  He also said whenever a corporation pays for a campaign ad, a major figure from that corporation should appear in the ad and claim responsibility for it.

Mr. Obama called for restrictions on campaign spending by foreign companies and foreign nationals.

The U.S. Supreme Court in January struck down long-standing limits on corporate spending in political campaigns.  The opinion signed by a majority of Justices stated that corporations have the same right to free speech as citizens, and that previous campaign finance laws were unconstitutional.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Toyota recalls 50,000 '03 Sequoia SUVs in U.S.

CHICAGO, April 29 (Xinhua) -- Toyota Motor Corp. will recall about 50,000 2003 Sequoia SUVs to upgrade program logic in its Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system, Toyota said on its website on Wednesday.
The VSC system can help control a loss of traction in turns as a result of front or rear tire slippage during cornering. In vehicles without the upgrade, the VSC system could, in limited situations, activate at low speed (approximately 9 mph) for a few seconds after acceleration from a stopped position and, as a result, the vehicle may not accelerate as quickly as the driver expects, Toyota said.
There have been no reported injuries or accidents as a result of this condition, it said.
"Toyota is committed to investigating customer complaints more aggressively and to responding quickly to issues we identify in our vehicles. As a result, we are voluntarily launching this recall to ensure that as many 2003 Sequoias as possible are serviced to the full satisfaction of our customers," said Steve St. Angelo, Toyota chief quality officer for North America.
Toyota will replace the skid control "Electronic Control Unit" and upgrade the software.
Toyota will start notifying customers at the end of May and will cover repairs previously made since April 2002; it has fixed about half of the recalled vehicles already under warranty.
Toyota has recalled more than 6 million vehicles in the United States over sudden acceleration concerns, including 5.4 million for pedal entrapment issues.
Related:
TORONTO, April 28 (Xinhua) -- Toyota Canada Inc. (TCI) has announced on Wednesday it will conduct a voluntary safety recall on approximately 1,500 2003 Model-Year Toyota Sequoia sport utility vehicles to upgrade program logic in its Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system.
The VSC system can help control a loss of traction in turns as a result of front or rear tire slippage during cornering. In rare instances, due to improper logic of Skid Control ECU programming, the Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system could activate at low speed (approximately 14 km/h) for a few seconds following acceleration from a stopped position and, as a result, the vehicle may not accelerate as quickly as the driver expects, said the company. Full story
TOKYO, April 27 (Xinhua) -- Seiji Maehara, Japan's Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, said Tuesday he plans to hold talks with U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood about Toyota's recent recalls.
Maehara, scheduled to visit the U.S. from Thursday to Saturday, said at a news conference he is confident the beleaguered automaker's recall problems will not adversely affect the two nations' bilateral alliance or economic relationship. Full story
TOKYO, April 26 (Xinhua) -- Toyota Motor Corp. announced Monday from its head office in Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, its global auto sales in fiscal 2009 fell 1.4 percent to 7,291,000 units, marking the second successive year of decline.
In the United States, Toyota's biggest global market, sales plummeted 10.4 percent in the year to March 31, as the automaker's brand image took a battering from a series of recalls. Full story

Citi CEO reiterates call for responsible finance





A woman walks out of a Citibank branch in New York, the United States, April 26, 2010. The federal government took its first step towards unloading its remaining stake in Citigroup, unveiling plans Monday to sell up to 1.5 billion shares in the banking giant. (Xinhua/Shen Hong)

NEW YORK, April 28 (Xinhua) -- Citigroup Inc. Chief Executive Vikram Pandit reiterated call Wednesday for responsible finance to restore confidence and trust in the financial system.
"A culture of responsibility is a powerful force, beyond rules and regulations, to help guard against bad judgments, temptations to push the envelope and the impulse to act in self-interest first," Pandit told audience at the Columbia University's World Leaders Forum.
Pandit was named the CEO of Citigroup on December 11, 2007. The bank suffered huge losses and was forced to accept three government rescues in 2008 and 2009.
"So what we do at the Citi is to pull ourselves out from the crisis, to build new Citi, to learn and remember the lessons of the turmoil we lived through of the last two years," the CEO said.
"After I became CEO, my management team and focus on three immediate priorities, financial strength, strategic clarity and cultural change," he added.
To return the basic of Banking, Citi will be 40 percent smaller in size compared with the peak in 2007, according to Pandit.
Citi, the biggest U.S. bank by market value before the crisis, repaid in December 20 billion U.S. dollars of the bailout funds it received from the government. The rest was converted into a 27 percent U.S. stake.
During his speech, Pandit reiterated his recent calls for "responsible finance" during the speech by saying that "We at Citi are creating a unified culture built on the values of responsible finance."
At Citigroup's annual shareholders meeting last week, Pandit said responsible finance "is the driving force behind the culture of the new Citi, and it is defined by the interests of our shareholders, customers and colleagues."
Pandit also urged Wednesday a "strong and clear regulatory reform," including a "level playing field for the global financial industry" and a clear regulatory authority to resolve the fate of systemically important institutions that become endangered.

Economists mixed over U.S. budget deficit woes

by Matthew Rusling
WASHINGTON, April 28 -- U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that the U.S. deficit was unsustainable, but economists were mixed over whether the deficit amounted to a manageable issue or a raging juggernaut.
"In the absence of further policy actions, the federal budget appears set to remain on an unsustainable path," Bernanke told the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform on Tuesday.
The deficit could push up interest rates, he said, adding that an action plan was needed to curb the risks involved with too much debt.
The U.S. deficit is an issue of primary concern for many fiscal conservatives, standing at 1.4 trillion U.S. dollars last year, or nearly 10 percent of U.S. economic output, a figure that could increase this year.
But not all economists agreed with Bernanke's assessment.
Josh Bivens, economist at the Economic Policy Institute think tank, maintained there was no evidence that high deficits pushed up interest rates.
"As long as private demand for new borrowing and spending is weak, then increased public borrowing will not cause sustained upward pressure on interest rates," he wrote in a report released Monday.
Bivens contended that "policy makers most commonly cite a concern over the federal budget deficit to justify their inaction on jobs."
"Deficit hawks invoke this specter every time these rates nudge upward and routinely issue warnings about how today's low rates can turn on a dime," he said.
Writing in the Guardian Unlimited newspaper, Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research think tank, argued that "A serious discussion of the deficit will show that in the short-term the deficit is not a problem and that the longer-term deficit is really a problem of a broken U.S. health care system."
And in his blog "Beat The Press," Baker contended that "Bernanke's statement provides no basis for determining whether this is a need to act now, in five years, or in 20 years. It effectively says nothing."

Brian Riedl, a research fellow in federal budget policy at the Heritage Foundation think tank, said that if spending trends continued, primarily in social security, Medicare and Medicaid, taxes would have to be doubled or else the next generation would inherit an immense load of debt.
"Either we are going to drown future generations in taxes or we are going to drown them in debt unless we reform spending," he said.
There are still some economists contending that while deficit spending can be risky, the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has few other options, and that little can be done in the near term to reign in spending.
While unemployment insurance is costly, allowing the unemployed to fall through the cracks and collapse consumption will cause the economy to falter even further, some economists said.
The number of those collecting unemployment benefits in the week that ended April 10 was 484,000, according to the Department of Labor.
The Obama administration contends that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other big Bush administration budget items, as well as the former administration's tax cuts, led to the deficit, as the United States boasted a budget surplus of 200 billion dollars at the start of the decade.
While many economists cite 3 percent of GDP as a benchmark of budget sustainability, others believe that is still too high. And still others contend the term "sustainable deficit" is undefined, as it depends on a number of assumptions about the economy, including health care costs and demographic changes.
Some observers said the president's concerns over the deficit -- the White House convened a special debt commission on Tuesday -- stemmed from the upcoming Congressional elections and reflected Democratic fears of losing seats to Republicans, while others argued that the administration's interest was solely in the economy.

President Obama said Tuesday he would not comment on what actions he would take to curb the federal debt until the commission concluded its report in December -- one month after November's congressional elections.
But the commission will consider every option, he said.
While Obama said he had taken steps to curb high deficit spending, it might not be enough to make up for years of heavy spending in Washington.
Appearing on Fox News on Wednesday, Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., who was in the room during the debt commission's meeting on Tuesday, said one primary factor driving U.S. debt was healthcare costs.
Critics said the commission amounted to political cover for a White House tax hike, as Obama had promised not to raise taxes on the middle class.
Observers said it could take some time to bring the deficit down if the administration opted to lower it with spending cuts as those took some time for Congress to execute.




Sunday, April 25, 2010

US Financial Reform Bill Faces Legislative Hurdle

Photo: AP
Alabama Senator Richard Shelby

A bill to reform America's financial system and ensure against future meltdowns faces a major legislative hurdle on Monday, when the Senate is expected to vote to begin debate on the measure.  Key Democratic and Republican senators are voicing doubts as to whether the bill will move forward in its current form.

The financial overhaul bill is more than 1,000 pages long and took a year to craft.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has scheduled a vote late Monday to bring the measure to the chamber's floor for debate, despite Republican threats to block the legislation.

The bill's author, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, was asked if the bill currently has enough support to clear the legislative hurdle. "We are getting there.  We are close.  We have some more work to do.  We are not there yet," he said.

The Connecticut Democrat Spoke on NBC's Meet The Press program. Also appearing was the top Republican on the banking committee, Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, who said the current version of the bill is unlikely to get Republican support. "Not yet, but we are getting there.  What we [Republicans] are trying to do is improve two or three things in it," he said.

The bill seeks to strengthen consumer protections in the financial industry, strengthen regulation and oversight of financial firms, limit the risk-taking ability of banks and other institutions, and establish a procedure for the federal government to liquidate insolvent financial corporations.

Senator Dodd says, without overhaul of the financial industry, the United States risks another financial meltdown.  In 2008, a cascading failure of banks, investment houses and other firms placed the nation in danger of economic collapse and prompted the federal government to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts. "Tomorrow, if another crisis occurred in the country, we are no better off than we were in the fall of 2008.  We have no cops on the beat [government regulation].  Major sections of our economy are unregulated entirely," he said.

But Republicans say the bill is inadequate.  They say it would give the federal government leeway to authorize future bailouts, and that it does not mandate preemptive action to break up institutions that are so large that, if they were to fail, would cripple the national economy.

Senator Shelby said, "The message should be, unambiguously, that nothing is too big to fail, and if you fail we are going to put you to sleep [out of business]."

But some Democrats accuse their Republican colleagues of attempting to delay the bill - not to improve it - but to block financial reform entirely.  Republicans reject the charge.  Polls show Americans bitter and angry about the financial havoc the nation has endured, and strongly opposed to bailouts at taxpayer expense.


Related Articles

Greece Optimistic About IMF, EU Loan Package

Greek Finance Minister George Papaconstantinou
Photo: Associated Press
Greek Finance Minister George Papaconstantinou

The Greek debt crisis remained a key topic on the sidelines of world economic talks of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in Washington.  The head of the IMF and Greece's finance minister expressed confidence that negotiations over a massive emergency loan package for the country would end soon.

Speaking at a news conference at IMF headquarters, Greek Finance Minister George Papaconstantinou said negotiations to secure $60-billion in loans from European governments and the International Monetary Fund are going well.

He expressed confidence that Greece could meet its deadlines for loan payments coming due in mid-May and that talks would conclude as soon as possible. "I think early May is a good ball-park figure.  I do not want to give a particular date.  We all know that these negotiations take weeks. We are working very fast," he said.

Papaconstantinou said the loan package framework has strong conditions, to help assure its European and IMF lenders, as well as fiscal measures to reassure Greek citizens efforts are being made to end the country's financial crisis.

The finance minister downplayed concerns that some European Union members were not fully supportive of the loan package and quickly shot down a question about what Greece might do if the loan was not approved by May. "There is no if.  The support mechanism will be ready during the month of May.  And there is absolutely no one in Europe or outside it that has a different opinion to this," he said.

In an interview published in a mass-circulation German newspaper (Bild am Sonntag), German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble was quoted as saying that the final decision on the package could either be positive or negative.

Germany could be one of the biggest contributors to the Greek bail-out plan.  Greece has accumulated more than $400-billion in public debt.

The country is seeking emergency loans of about $40-billion from European countries and an additional sum of more than $13-billion from the IMF.

In a statement, IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said everyone trying to help Greece understands the "need for speed."

Officials in Europe and the IMF have made it clear to Greece that their support is contingent on efforts by the country to put its fiscal house in order.

Greece has agreed to begin an austerity program that cuts civil servants' pay, freezes pensions and raises taxes.  That program has triggered massive street protests and labor strikes in Greece.

During the past few days of the spring meetings of the IMF and World Bank in Washington, the 186 countries that own the World Bank Group have endorsed a boost in its capital by more than $86-billion.  They also agreed to give developing countries more voting rights, increasing the voting power of developing and transition countries by a little more than three percentage points.

A World Bank said the "historic changes" will also help position the poverty fighting institution to help what it called a "transformed world" as it emerges from the global economic crisis.

Market of one billion becomes reality

BEIJING, April 26 -- James McGregor believes the much-heralded one-billion-customer China market may at last be becoming a reality.
The bestselling author on China business says that far from being too late for foreign companies to enter China, there may never have been a better time.
"Foreigners have always had the dream of the China market, the hundreds of millions, if not a billion, customers. The truth of the matter is that that reality is starting to approach. There is actually a huge and growing consumer market in China," he said.
Reaching the Chinese consumer has been something of a holy grail for international businesses, even when the country had only 400 million people in the 1930s.
McGregor, a former chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said with the country's middle class expanding fast, tapping into a huge market could be a realistic goal for companies with the right strategy.
"There is no market like China in the world. It is a continental-sized market that has another billion people to reach the middle class. If you develop a product here and could scale it up enough, you can be a global winner," he said.
McGregor, who wrote One Billion Customers: Lessons from the Front Lines of Doing Business in China, said foreign companies do not have an automatic right to a share of this cake.
"The Chinese consumer market has started to emerge. How big a piece of that foreigners are going to get remains to be seen. China is full of extremely capable and hardworking business people who understand their own people's wants and desires," he says.
McGregor, who is now a senior counselor in Beijing for the worldwide strategic communications group APCO, says foreign companies coming to China face stiffer competition than they did even five years ago.
"It is a much more competitive market than it used to be and it is going to get tougher in some sectors," he said.
He said one of the problems faced by foreign companies, particularly since the start of the economic crisis, has been provincial governments trying to protect indigenous businesses from outside competition.
"You have a time now where there are a lot of local governments protecting their local companies and discriminating against foreign companies. The foreign business community certainly feels that way," he added.
McGregor says the immense power of China's State-owned enterprises can make life very difficult for anyone wanting to do business in the country.
"State-owned enterprises are very powerful. They have access to capital and they have the relationships here that bring them a lot of business opportunities. I think even some Chinese private entrepreneurs have concerns about the recent emphasis on State industry," he said.
McGregor, a former journalist, came to Taiwan as bureau chief of the Wall Street Journal in the island in 1987.
He moved to Beijing in a similar role three years later before becoming chief executive officer of Dow Jones' businesses interests in the mainland.
He is best known for his 2005 book about China's one billion-customer market, which was a top selling business book around the world.
It highlighted the major business opportunities in the country as well as outlining some of the pitfalls.
"If you come here and try and do the big bang of building a huge business overnight, it fails 100 per cent of the time," he said.
"The way to do business in China is to come in small, learn your way around, decide if you need a partner and hire very capable local staff and then do it step by step. You can't come in here with too little patience."
McGregor says that in a number of ways doing business in China has become easier in recent years because business practices have become more established and there is a better legal framework.
"There are more rules and laws, which have made a lot of things more transparent. There is more normalization of business here. It is a much more mature business environment," he said.
He believes one of the problems for a lot of foreign companies is whether their intellectual property rights will be protected, particularly in the area of technology.
He cites China's indigenous innovation policy, which has a clause to allow re-innovation of foreign technology.
"You are not going to get innovation by trying to force foreign companies to reveal more about their own technology. I think that will set innovation back here," he said.
"If you look at Silicon Valley you have got thousands and thousands of very talented Chinese engineers. If you want to get them back here, you need to protect IPR, so they know they can return and invent something and build a company up around it."
McGregor sees there is risk of further commercial clashes between China and the United States. He said if the American market is to remain open to Chinese exports then the Chinese have to allow free and fair competition to US companies wanting to enter China.
"China needs to be confident enough in its own companies to have a market here where there is fair competition. It is the only way Chinese companies will be able to go global, if they can win in markets that are fair at home," he said.

Post-crisis challenges urge global economic cooperation

BEIJING, April 24 (Xinhua) -- Amid the world economic recovery that still faces great uncertainties today, all countries should enhance policy coordination and cooperate in coping with post-crisis challenges.

Finance ministers, central bank governors and economists from more than 180 countries will discuss main global issues at the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) slated for Saturday and Sunday in Washington.
Sovereign credit crisis, exit strategies from stimulus measures and financial regulatory reform are the main challenges the world economy currently faces.
Although the recovery is better than expected, developed economies have not got rid of the downturn as their sovereign debts and fiscal risks have been highlighted recently.
Greek Finance Minister George Papaconstantinou on Friday formally requested activation of the European Union (EU)-IMF support mechanism to pull the country out of its severe economic and debt crisis.
The Greek move came after a higher-than-expected 2009 budget deficit announced by Eurostat and a lowered bank credit rating by international rating agency Moody's.
Greece is not the only country that is suffering sovereign credit crisis. Sovereign credit ratings of Iceland, Ireland, Mexico, Italy, Portugal and Spain have also been downgraded.
Moreover, the sovereign credit of the United States, Britain, Germany and France has also been questioned.
Such a crisis reflected the prevailing debt-repaying pressure of the governments against the backdrop of the financial crisis.
Over the past two years, many countries have borrowed massive loans to stimulate their economy.
The IMF estimated 4.5 trillion-U.S. dollar bonds would be issued globally in 2010, tripling the average amount of money that the developed economies have borrowed in the past five years.
To alleviate the investors' concerns and avoid a global sovereign credit crisis, each country should regulate its fiscal order and curb deficit and the sharp rise in public debts.
The exit strategies from monetary and economic stimulus policies, adopted since the start of the financial crisis, have also brought new challenges to the world economy and added uncertainty to its recovery.

Charts offer best way to find financial fraud


BEIJING, April 26 -- American financial giant Goldman Sachs has been charged with fraud over one of the subprime investment products it created and sold. The only surprise in finding fraud in the subprime products area is that it has taken so long to bring the charges. Investors have been bringing allegations of deceptive subprime product descriptions to courts throughout 2009. More fraud charges in relation to the creation and sale of these products are probably under development.
Unfortunately, fraud and financial markets go hand in hand which is why strong financial market regulators and regulations are required. However, the investors cannot afford to rely only on regulators for protection. Investors must take action to protect themselves against fraud in the market. Fraud comes in many forms, and the global financial crisis quickly exposed many cases of fraud which had been undetected by the conventional analysis of financial fundamentals.
The collapse of US company Enron in 2001 was a good example of fraud that was undetected by conventional analysis. Those investors who do not learn from history and doomed to repeat it. So many of the recent frauds follow the same patterns as the Enron fraud.
Just weeks before its suspension from trading and after a near 80 percent fall in its share price, Enron was hailed by American business magazine Fortune and financial analysts as "one of the most innovative US companies". The Enron share price was to fall to 26 cents, down from $100. This unrelenting downtrend had been in place for eleven months. Who should investors believe? The chart or financial analysts?
The audit reports showed a clean bill of health. When the share price had fallen by around 70 percent a respected analyst declared that the company was financially sound and a wonderful buying opportunity. After a short rally from $30, the downtrend returned, closing six weeks later at $0.26. The long-term downtrend showed the market did not believe the company reports or the financial analysts. In 2002 the truth emerged as the full extent of the fraud was revealed.
Investors should listen to the behavior of the market when there is a contradiction between market activity and financial reports.

Turn the clock forward nine years and very little has changed. The gap between the conclusions of conventional financial analysis and the conclusion of technical analysis remain unbridged. The behavioral analysis methods for detecting potential irregularities remain the same, and unfortunately, remain underutilized. These are the essential recognition features which can be applied by any investor to add to the layer of protection already offered by financial market regulation.
There is one simple rule; Look for contradictions between financial analysis and market behavior shown on the chart. When there is a contradiction always believe the chart. Investors who applied this rule to General Motors, Citibank and Bank of America all avoided substantial losses in 2008. Analysts and company reports were defensively bullish, blaming irrational behavior for the initial price falls. Market behavior shown by the price charts and simple technical analysis showed the market did not believe the financial analysts.
Technical indicators are the only true objective gauge of market psychology and money flows. That doesn't mean investors get every call right. Understanding charts and price activity is part science and part art. But the investment discipline of technical analysis gives a significant advantage over analysis methods that rely on the unfailing honesty of company financial reports.
Subprime products were not traded on the open transparent market so there was no method to independently assess the information provided by the promoters of these products. The rating agencies were unable to overcome the inherent conflict of interest in their business model.
Financial product developers, such as Goldman Sachs pay a fee to the rating agencies to "independently" provide an investing rating for their financial products. Conflicts of interest are inevitable and unavoidable. The solution for truly independent rating of investment products is complex and difficult.
Transparency in all financial market trading is essential. Transparency provides the additional layer of protection against fraud because investors can see the behavior of the market and identify contradictions. The methods are cheap and available to anybody who wishes to use them.

US Press Briefing on the Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
April 23, 2010

PRESS BRIEFING ON THE PRESIDENTIAL SUMMIT ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP
BY BEN RHODES, DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR FOR STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS;
PRADEEP RAMAMURTHY, NSC SENIOR DIRECTOR FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT;
FRANCISCO SANCHEZ, UNDERSECRETARY FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE;
JUDITH MCHALE, UNDERSECRETARY FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Via Teleconference

MR. RHODES:  Thanks, everybody, for joining the call.  We wanted to take this opportunity to walk you through the Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship that we’ll be hosting on Monday and Tuesday.  I'm joined by some of my colleagues here at the NSC, as well as the Department of Commerce and Department of State, which are hosting the call; and you’ll all have the opportunity to talk to them as well.  I'll just say a few words and give you the agenda for the summit.
To begin with, this was a direct commitment that the President made in his Cairo speech last June.  The context for it, of course, was the President was addressing a range of very important political and security issues that have really dominated the focus of the United States and many countries and particular regions around the world.

In the speech he addressed, for instance, our effort to defeat al Qaeda, the war in Iraq, Iran and its pursuit of a nuclear program, as well as, of course, the Arab-Israeli conflict.  However, he also made the point that even as we continue to work very aggressively to address these issues and to resolve these conflicts, that the United States wanted to build and deepen a set of partnerships with Muslim communities around the world on issues that are really fundamental to our own lives related to education and economic opportunity, and science and technology, and health, and that by building those partnerships we can serve our mutual interests and advance a more positive relationship between the United States and Muslim-majority countries around the world.

So we really see this as one of a series of steps that we’ve taken to do so, to fulfill the commitments the President made in Cairo.  I'll quickly walk through a few of them.
We’ve appointed several science envoys to travel to different regions of the world to deepen our scientific cooperation.  We’ve pursued a partnership with the Organization of the Islamic Conference to eradicate polio, which continues to be a great challenge in a number of Muslim-majority countries.  We’ve expanded educational programs and initiatives in particular countries around the world and are going to look to continue to do so, of course against the backdrop of working very hard in a very focused way onto political and security issues that are of great concern to the United States and to people around the world.
One of the commitments the President made was on entrepreneurship.  We believe entrepreneurship is a fundamental American value, and it’s also a force that has the ability to unlock opportunity for people around the world.  And some of my colleagues can speak in greater specificity to that.

So we believe that it’s both an area that over the very long term we can develop a set of partnerships around the world that can serve the interests of communities as well as the interests of the United States and countries around the world in unleashing economic growth and development.

This summit is just a part of that process.  We believe that it can serve the purpose of catalyzing action, and it already has, frankly, in private-sector follow-up, foundation follow-up, follow-up actions by other countries in many different regions of the world.  So we believe that this is an important opportunity for the United States to galvanize that action.
I would note, for instance, that the President hosted 47 leaders and heads of government at the Nuclear Security Summit just two weeks ago.  This of course is a different kind of engagement.  We’re hosting no government officials as a part of this.  This is a summit that is going to bring together entrepreneurs -- social entrepreneurs, people from various -- many different countries, and again my colleagues can speak to that -- around this question of how we can galvanize entrepreneurship on behalf of economic growth.
With that, I'll just walk through the agenda, and then let my colleagues speak to some more specifics.  The whole summit, by the way, will be live-streamed, so this will all be available to people around the world.  It will begin on Monday morning.  All the activities will be at the Reagan Building.  There will be a series of panels.  The panels will have several participants on them.  I'll just speak to the people leading the panels, that lead U.S. government representation on them, and then turn it over to my colleagues.

The first panel will be on perspectives on successful entrepreneurship.  It will be led by the Secretary of Commerce, Gary Locke.  And it will bring together a number of successful entrepreneurs from different regions around the world who will offer their perspectives on the lessons that they’ve learned in pursuing successful entrepreneurship, how those lessons might be applied to open the door to opportunity for others around the world.

Then there will be a lunch focused on innovation and technology, where Jerry Yang, the CEO of Yahoo, will give the keynote, focused on the role of technology, which, of course, has the ability to unlock an extraordinary amount of activity related to entrepreneurship and economic opportunity in the 21st century.
Then there will be a panel in the afternoon led by Dr. Rajiv Shah, the Administrator of USAID, addressing the challenge of entrepreneurs getting access to capital in order to pursue their own ideas and opportunities.
Following that there will be a panel on catalyzing youth entrepreneurship.  This will be led by Shahid Ansari, the dean and provost of Babson College -- focused, of course, on the role of education and training in fostering entrepreneurship.  Many of the regions that will be highly represented at the summit -- Africa, the Middle East, Southeast Asia -- have extraordinary youth populations, and it will, of course, become increasingly important to be able to channel the promise of that youth towards entrepreneurship in a way that can create economic opportunities.
Arne Duncan, the U.S. Secretary of Education, will participate on that panel.
Following that, the President will address the summit, and it will be an opportunity for the President to speak to his commitment to building these kinds of positive partnerships around the world, to deepening our engagement around the world with Muslim-majority communities, as well as all of those who are interested in pursuing partnerships with the United States on behalf of issues such as entrepreneurship.

The next day we will begin with remarks from Larry Summers, Director of the National Economic Council.  He’ll be able to share his unique perspective on how entrepreneurship fits into modes of economic growth and partnership.
Then there will be a panel on promoting entrepreneurship and enabling business that will be led by Karen Mills, the Administrator of the SBA in the United States, who will of course be able to offer a unique perspective on the kinds of capacity that can be provided the help people around the world overcome challenges to starting their own businesses.

Then there will be a panel on social entrepreneurship led by Sonai Shah, who is the Director of the White House Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation.  Social entrepreneurship is of course a growing trend in many parts of the world and has the ability to foster community development, to address specific challenges in communities while also expanding opportunity.  It’s something that has galvanized a lot of action among young people in particular.  So we’ll be able to address social entrepreneurship through this panel.
Then there will be a panel led by Pradeep Ramamurthy, a Senior Director for Global Engagement here at the White House, will address the cultural factors that can encourage and discourage entrepreneurship and how to marry a commitment to entrepreneurship with distant cultures around the world.

Then at lunch there will be a discussion on mentoring and giving back, led by S.A. Ibrahim, the CEO of the Radian Group.  He will be able to discuss the ways in which those of us who are more fortunate can foster the next generation of entrepreneurs.


And then, finally, there will be a panel on unleashing the power of women entrepreneurs.  The President obviously, as he said in Cairo, believes strongly that when women are able to live up to their full potential it can both empower women, but also unleash the potential of communities and economic opportunity in many different parts of the world in a way that can serve all of our mutual interests.  This panel will be led by Farah Pandith, the State Department Special Representative for Muslim Communities.  Valerie Jarrett, of course a very close senior advisor to the President will join us as well, given her longstanding interest in these issues.
And then, finally, the summit will be closed by remarks from Secretary Clinton.  We’ll be able to put a wrap on the lessons that have been learned at the summit and the commitment of the United States to these issues going forward.
The only thing I’d say before I turn it over is that we’d expect there to be some specific announcements related to projects that the U.S. government will undertake going forward on entrepreneurship, from a range of departments from USAID to the State Department to some of the other USG entities -- Commerce and others who will be represented at this summit.  We will hold those of course until Monday, but we expect to have a series of announcements related to what the U.S. government will be doing going forward in this area.

Beyond that, though, I would also say that we believe that a key function is not simply what our government is doing, but more importantly frankly, the kind of action it can galvanize by other governments, by private sector, by foundations.  And so what we hope to be doing with this is using the convening power and leadership of the U.S. government and the President to galvanize action across a range of areas and by a range of different actors so that going forward there’s greater momentum behind this particular issue and these partnerships that we’re building.

So with that, I'll turn it over to my colleague who can discuss how we invited some of the participants and then turn to our colleagues from Commerce and State who are co-hosting the summit to speak to their role.

MR. RAMAMURTHY:  So I just want to touch briefly just on kind of the processes that got us here and the diversity of the participants and some of the unique features.

The summit is very much kind of part of a process for us, both there’s been a huge process leading into it and we’ve already got kind of a sustainable way to make sure the conversation on entrepreneurship continues.  Beginning almost the week after the Cairo speech, our embassies around the world started holding roundtables with students, government leaders, business leaders, religious leaders -- everybody that I think we would want to reach out to -- to get their perspective on areas where they saw opportunities for partnership that would be mutually beneficial.

And one of those areas that shown through was entrepreneurship, economic growth, and issues like that.  And so we’ve since had a series of more focused conversations about entrepreneurship specifically.  Our embassies have done similar things -- held roundtables, town halls.  USAID recently held a virtual listening session that reached -- where about 7,000 participants from, I think, over 150 countries participated in that, and entrepreneurship was a focus there.  We’ve also held listening sessions in concert with other international organizations in places like Cairo.

So the agenda, the people that are invited, kind of the projects that we’re thinking about are developed based on a very robust kind of effort to listen, which was one of the things that the President talked about in Cairo.
And the participants themselves, it’s been mentioned, there’s about 250 of them from -- I think we’re approaching 60 countries.  It’s a very diverse group.  We have business entrepreneurs from virtually every sector you can think of, from kind of real estate to technology, the people that are working on incubation and venture capital.  We have social entrepreneurs that, you know, are spanning from people like Muhammad Yunus -- who obviously has almost a global presence in terms of microfinance, microcredit -- to people that are really working at the grassroots level.  For example, we’ve got someone from Central Asia who’s organizing people that are producing handicrafts, to take the profits from the sales of those to reinvest in their communities.

And we have a very diverse age range, from I think 29 -- 20, sorry, the youngest, and the oldest, I think, is 79.  And this is I think a very unique gathering in the sense that it bridges both kind of the business and social entrepreneurship communities but also the people that are relevant to advancing entrepreneurship more generally -- educators, investors, people that are in the foundation world, obviously from our side, from the government -- and I think it’s just a unique example of kind of how our convening power can bring together a lot of different people, then, as my colleague said, catalyze activity.

I think we’ve already seen some of that the days after the summit.  There are, I think, over 30 related events that independent organizations are hosting.  I think we’ve seen some organizations take advantage of the summit to make their own commitments in how they’re going to advance entrepreneurship.

And the last point I'd make is that in terms of how we’ve approached this, I think both the panels -- and you heard from my colleague about the USG folks that are on there -- and kind of engagement on this really reflects the whole government focus that we’ve brought to this -- everybody from SBA to Commerce, State, USAID, OPEC, U.S. Trade and Development Agency, Education, Labor, et cetera.  And I think that's one of the things that we wanted to do out of Cairo, and I think this is a tangible example of where we’ve kind of brought together the entire government to focus on an issue.

In terms of -- I don't know, do you want me to just move on?

MR. RHODES:  We can come back to that.  With that, let me just turn it over to my colleague here from the Commerce Department who will be a co-host of this event and can speak to the particular perspective of Commerce.

MR. SANCHEZ:  Thank you.  From a commercial perspective, the summit is going to focus on the important role that entrepreneurship can play in promoting economic growth, and in particular, in supporting job creation and community development.
It’s particularly important for the United States to forge strong trade and commercial ties with the Muslim-majority countries, and in fact, we already do have strong ties.  In 2008, total trade between the U.S. and Muslim-majority countries exceeded $360 billion.

So I’m confident that we can build on that, and from this summit create partnerships that are going to be mutually beneficial and can support job creation and economic opportunity, both in the United States and overseas.  In an era when the American economy is tied to the global economy and when trade relationships and exports abroad help create jobs at home, it is very much in America’s economic interest to develop stronger, closer links between entrepreneurs both here in the U.S. and abroad.  So I look forward to taking any questions you might have.

MR. RHODES:  Great.  And before we move to questions, we’ll just turn to State to talk through the ways in which we are making this truly a global summit through some of our outreach activity -- 50 to 60 countries that will be represented here at the summit.

MS. MCHALE:  Thank you.  I’ll just sort of build on what everyone else has been saying, in terms of it.  The entrepreneurship summit and the whole concept of entrepreneurship is center -- the center part of our global engagement strategy.  And we believe quite strongly that this will allow us to sort of create a good foundation for long-term relationships and provide entrepreneurs with the resources and support that they need as they -- in the critical area of entrepreneurship, which as we all know leads to economic and social benefits around the world.

So our embassies -- I’m going to talk about three things that our embassies have been doing:  the lead-up to the event, what will be happening during the event, and then the follow-up, which frankly may be the most important part of it.
Leading up the event, as my colleague has mentioned, many of the embassies have had roundtables.  They were obviously very active in soliciting and submitting names of people to participate in the event.  They’ve had numerous activities reaching out to them, and media activities as well.
During the event itself, we will have live-streaming of all the major sessions over the Internet.  We’re also going to use all appropriate media wherever possible -- TV, radio.  Some of the things have already begun.  We’ve already had some blogs online, and we’re seeing that those are being pushed out beyond the government Web sites and being picked up by such outlets as allafrica.com and others.  So we’re going to look to do that.  We are going to have as much of the information as we can translated into multiple languages to maximize the impact.
A key focus obviously at the local level will be on the entrepreneurs from a particular country.  There has been enormous interest from the media in those countries in following the individuals who will be coming from their countries, both leading up to it and during the event, and, again, most importantly, after the event.

We want to continue the relationships that we’re making as part of this.  We want to continue in sustaining them long after the summit itself has concluded.  And so our embassies have a number of plans in place to be able to do that, including a very -- creating a very good and robust alumni network so that we can continue to stay connected with the entrepreneurs, provide them with the support and resources that they might need, help them connect with entrepreneurs that they have met at the summit and create a very lively, vibrant global network, which we think is going to benefit all of us as we go forward.

So with that, I will turn to back to my colleague.

MR. RHODES:  Great.  And with that we’d be happy to take any of your questions.
Q   One quick housekeeping, are your comments on the record?  And my question is, what specific criteria was used in selecting these entrepreneurs?  And are the majority of these guys who are coming Muslim?  I find that from India, out of the six, five are Muslim.  So would you say that 90 percent of them are Muslim?
And in that case, how would you sort of rebuff the contention that this is sort of a huge propaganda exercise by giving all of them a free trip and then hopefully getting them to go back and not be anti-American?  Is this sort of a huge

propaganda reach-out exercise?

MR. RHODES:  Well, I’ll just speak to the second question.  First of all, I’ll just speak to the second question.  First of all, yes, my comments are on the record.  But I’ll speak to your question and then I think my colleague can speak to some more detail on the selection process criteria.

First of all, as it relates to those who were invited, more broadly -- and again, I think my colleague can speak to the specifics of it -- but we put no restriction on religion.  And there are actually a diversity of religions that will be represented among the participants.  The United States government, for instance, doesn’t query people about their religious background as we pursue people’s participation in events like this.

However, this was a particular commitment of the President’s coming out of the Cairo speech, focused on deepening engagement with Muslim-majority countries and communities around the world.  So therefore the countries and, in some instances, regions of countries that were queried and represented in the outreach that we did in building a participants list was focused on Muslim-majority countries or countries with large Muslim minorities.

The geographic diversity is global, though.  It spans from the Middle East to North Africa to Southeast Asia to Europe to Latin America.  So we have a very global representation.  So we couldn’t even tell you what the precise breakdown is in terms of religious affiliation.  But what we can say is that we believe that, again, the majority of the participants will come from Muslim-majority communities, but we’ll also have a broad diversity of folks at the summit.
And, again, before my colleague speaks a little bit more in detail about the selection criteria, I’d just say that this is not simply an exercise in public outreach or public diplomacy.  We believe that this is the beginning of forging kind of very tangible partnerships in a critical area -- entrepreneurship.  And that, frankly, it’s a part of America’s leadership around the world to do so.
You heard my colleague from Commerce speak to the benefits to the United States and the world that come from economic growth and the kind of partnerships that come from entrepreneurship.  But I think that when you look at U.S. leadership over many decades, one of the things that has been a very positive force for American leadership around the world is the role that we’ve played in catalyzing economic growth and fostering economic development.  And we want to get in the business of forging partnerships that can help catalyze entrepreneurship and economic growth in many different places around the world.  And that the kinds of networks that come out of this kind of summit, these can be the basis for continued cooperation going forward.  And I think what you’d expect to see is the United States cooperating on a bilateral basis with many countries on entrepreneurship issues, on a multi-lateral basis in some instances.

I think you’ll see other countries take an interest in pursuing entrepreneurship.  I think, for instance, just to take one example, Indonesia is taking an acute interest in carrying forward some of the momentum generated by the summit.  And, frankly, I think you’d see an extraordinary amount of activity in the private sector among foundations in carrying forward on the promise represented by the summit.

So this is part of a very long-term program.  We, of course, want to ensure that our efforts are effectively understood, which is why we're going to make a very active effort to communicate back to countries that have participants about what we're doing.  But we really want to follow up in a concrete way in carrying forward the initiatives of the summit so that one of the things that the United States is part of doing in all of these countries is sponsoring entrepreneurship, which, again, is a part of our leadership.  It’s in our own interests and it’s in the interests of the kind of individuals who are attending the summit; it’s in the interests of the communities that they’re coming from to catalyze economic growth.

So it’s a win-win proposition for all of those who are involved in the summit, for the United States and for the countries who will have participants at the summit.

Do you want to talk a little bit more about the selection criteria?
MR. RAMAMURTHY:  So the participants are selected in two ways.  We asked embassies in obviously over 50 countries to kind of identify from their countries the highest potential entrepreneurs and those successful entrepreneurs kind of in those kind of spaces -- not just the most successful, but people that are younger and have the highest potential.  In addition to that, we had a Web site where we took applications and nominations from around the world, and that was a publicly available Web site which we had announced back in the fall.

And so I think the majority of the participants that we have come from those two processes.  And we looked at the nominations -- and obviously we got far more nominations than we could actually accommodate -- and we talked to, worked with entrepreneurs that are currently in our government to kind of -- experts outside of it -- to figure out kind of the right combination of criteria to include -- to look through some of those nominations and I think we are roughly at around 250 that we extended invitations to.  So those are the two processes.
And in addition to that, we added a few dozen folks to make sure that we had people that -- from that surrounding ecosystem:  educators, foundations, philanthropists and folks that could help nurture that environment.
Q    Thank you very much for doing this.  We are from Alhurra TV.  Did you know the majority of Muslim nations represented in this summit refuse to have any relations, business-level-wise, with Israel, also represented here?  How much of an impediment is this to achieving the goals of the summit?  And will this issue be discussed, addressed during the summit, at least from a business trade or commercial perspective, in the absence of political leaders?

MR. RHODES:  Sure.  I'll just make a couple of comments about this.  We believe, again, that this summit is focused on the kinds of economic and entrepreneurial partnerships that can be forged between the United States and other countries, but of course among the kinds of participants who will be coming themselves.  We have participants coming from Israel as well as over 50 other countries.  Israel of course is a very dynamic and entrepreneurial country and we believe has a unique view of catalyzing entrepreneurship, given, again, the economic growth that they’ve demonstrated.

Again, this is not a summit focused on political issues.  It’s focused on entrepreneurial issues, so we believe that this is an area where people can work together to serve their mutual interests.  So we would not anticipate that that would in any way be an impediment to a robust discussion of the kinds of issues that we’ll be addressing through the panels and through the summit.

So we hope to have this be an opportunity to foster positive partnerships and to move together on issues that are undeniably of common interests to people from many countries, whether it’s the United States, whether it’s Israel, whether it’s -- and all of the other countries that will be represented through the participants who will be there.

MR. SANCHEZ:  And if I could add that economic growth is not entirely dependent on political cooperation.  That’s certainly a part of it.  But you need the entrepreneurs.  You need the people in the business community to really make things happen.  And so a big part of this is bringing people from all over the world who will contribute to that foundation of entrepreneurship and economic growth.

Q    Thank you.  Some of the participants who come from Arab countries also come from heavily government and controlled states.  How do you expect them to go back and implement what they have learned here when you have heavy-handed government interference and regulations?

MR. RHODES:  Sure.  Well, I’d say a couple things for starters.  It’s a very good question.  I’d say, first of all, as my colleagues have said and I have said, that we made a very conscious choice to have this be focused on individuals, on people-to-people exchanges, if you will, rather than simply just having governments represented at the summit.

So we wanted to make it -- and similarly, we didn’t simply want to invite major business leaders.  We wanted to have a combination of important business leaders, but also smaller and medium-sized entrepreneurs, younger people just getting started.  And what we wanted to do is use the summit to address both the positive models of entrepreneurship that have worked in different places, but to address in a very direct way some of the obstacles to entrepreneurship around the world.
And so what we believe is that the summit will provide a forum for people who face different obstacles depending on where they’re coming from.  And I think there are obstacles to entrepreneurship in every country and every region of the world.  Those obstacles can be unique and can range from the cultural environment, the societal environment, or the political environment.  And that by coming together, by addressing those, by addressing how those are dealt with in different places, that it can help entrepreneurs overcome challenges, learn from their peers and their peers’ experience in different parts of the world.

In some instances, given the U.S. government participation, learn from the kinds of models of success that have worked in the United States and forge connections, frankly, that can empower people, because one of the things that the summit will do is connect people to other entrepreneurs, to foundations, to other non-NGOs.
So we believe that the kind of tough issues, some of which you highlighted in your question, will certainly be matters of discussion, and that the best way to help people begin to overcome any barriers to entrepreneurship is to have a robust opportunity to address those issues, to learn from one another, and to pursue solutions that can help empower them going forward.

But, again, this is a long -- this is a process that will take some time.  Different countries are in different stages of economic development.  And different countries have different contexts to entrepreneurship.  What we’re trying to do is within that context find the models that can empower people for success.

MS. MCHALE:  I’ll just sort of add into it -- and I think you’ve basically covered everything.  My observation has been -- from all the entrepreneurs that I’ve met around the world -- that they tend to be the innovative and creative individuals -- among the most creative and innovative individuals in their societies.  And I think the great benefit of this particular summit is the opportunity to come and to connect with individuals in other areas who may have faced similar circumstances so that they can develop new resources, find new models for going forward.

But I have absolutely no doubt that all of the people we've invited, no matter what the circumstances, are ones who are willing to confront them.  They understand them.  They are looking for solutions to the problems within their countries, because they’re very focused on the growth of their companies and ultimately the growth of their country.

MR. RAMAMURTHY:  I just want to add a couple things.  Just by way of some of the panelists’ biographies -- there’s a woman that's coming from, I think, Afghanistan, and to echo my colleague’s point, during the era of Taliban rule, I mean if you can think about a situation where there’s an authoritarian, repressive government, during the era of Taliban rule, the woman basically set up a tailoring company so they could find a way of getting resources to help develop her own community.

And similarly, you take another situation -- we have several entrepreneurs coming from Somalia who are doing really incredible work there.  So I think, as my colleague said, there are obstacles to entrepreneurship everywhere, ranging, obviously -- and I think you could take obviously a situation like Afghanistan under the Taliban is on one end of that spectrum, and I think my colleague’s point that entrepreneurs can find their way even in the toughest of circumstances I think is an important point.

The other issue I would just mention is that a lot of -- there is a panel that's focused on kind of how government can better enable entrepreneurship.  And that's being led by our SBA Administrator and includes Mo Ibrahim, for example, who has talked quite a bit about this over the years.

The absolute last point I would make on this is that we of the U.S. government also work with a lot of countries, actually through a partnership between State and the Department of Commerce called the Commercial Law Development program, to kind of assist other countries in developing legal frameworks and policy frameworks that encourage the development of commerce -- small business entrepreneurship, et cetera.

Q    Thanks for doing this call.  I have one question just about what happens after the conference is over?  Are you giving some seed money to business entrepreneurs?  How are you going to connect to them or help them establish their business or to go ahead with the (inaudible)?

MR. RHODES:  Sure.  I'll just make a number of comments here.  I think that what you’ll see out of the U.S. government is, on Monday and Tuesday at the summit we’ll have a set of specific announcements about support that the United States government is going to provide in the space of entrepreneurship.  That will cut across a number of different agencies.  It will range from programs at the Department of State and USAID, which are very active in entrepreneurship, to Commerce, and OPIC and others who also can play a role in catalyzing growth around the world.  So first there will be specific U.S. government initiatives that are tied to entrepreneurship.

Secondly, though, and I think this is more important in many respects, is catalyzing momentum around entrepreneurship among non-governmental actors and other governments, as well.  And so what we want to see is -- for instance, you heard my colleague say it, I think there will be something like -- on the order of 30 events in Washington alone related to entrepreneurship in the days following the summit.  It will be an opportunity for people to continue the discussion, to continue to get connected to one another, to continue to connect to the kinds of NGOs, private sector, foundation kind of support that can foster innovation and entrepreneurship.

Similarly, we expect there to be announcements of follow-on summits in other countries down the line so that there is continued follow-up in this area, and that that follow-up is in different regions.

And so this is kind of one -- an important step in a process.  The U.S. government is using the convening power of the President and the United States to bring together a very dynamic and diverse group of entrepreneurs from over 50 countries here.  We’re going to put some commitment of the U.S. government behind this effort.  We have our own announcements, but we’re also trying to catalyze efforts by others, going forward.

And I'll turn it over to, I think, my colleague in Commerce.

MR. SANCHEZ:  Yes, and just to add that Commerce will be organizing or assisting about 25 commercial missions.  About half of those will be outgoing to many of the countries that are participating.  About a dozen of them will be incoming from countries that are going -- all of this intended to foster stronger commercial and trade ties.
MS. MCHALE:  And I'll just sort of add I think we all well understand that entrepreneurs, one of the things that they’re looking for is access to capital to grow their companies.
And so that has been -- as we’ve looked at this, that's one of the factors that we factored in, in terms of the information of that and resources that we are going to try to provide to them; how do they actually go about and do that and what are those resources.

And I think we’re also reaching out to the private sectors to try and engage them.  And there will be some announcement about that as we go forward in the way of creating networks of opportunity for the entrepreneurs participating in the event.

And then very quickly on the follow-up, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, we are going to be building a very robust alumni network so they can stay connected with each other and that we can continue to feed into that network access to information with respect to access to capital amongst other things.  So we’re well aware that this is a key need for them, and it will be, as my colleague says, the first step in a process.

MR. RHODES:  Yes, and I'll just say one other thing before we go to the next question.  The range of countries and places that we expect to see follow on is very diverse.  The interests that we’ve already gotten from governments or from private-sector actors or NGOs range from Indonesia, to the United Arab Emirates, to Iraq, to Algeria, to Bahrain, France, Kyrgyzstan.

So I think what you’ll see is an announcement of many different follow-on actions and conferences and summits hosted again by governments, by business councils, by universities.  So we’re setting in motion here -- we hope to be a very broad and sustained process that can support entrepreneurship, foster economic opportunities, and deepen ties among the United States and the many Muslim-majority countries that are represented here at the summit.

Q    There’s something I just want you to clarify for me.  I understand that this comes as part of President Obama’s speech in Cairo, the whole idea of new beginnings.  But the actual idea of entrepreneurship and developing opportunity is really -- and the huge amount of countries that are involved in this -- really have very little to do with the idea of them being from Muslim-majority countries with ties to Muslim.  So isn’t imposing a religious context or, you know, the fact that this is Muslim-majority countries imposing almost like a false category onto it?

MR. RHODES:  No, it’s a good question.  I don’t think so at all.  I think the President in Cairo, again, was focused on a new beginning in which the United States and Muslim-majority countries and communities could both work together to address issues of intense political concern.  And again, he addressed them in the speech, and we continue to address them every single day related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, related to ending the war in Iraq, related to al Qaeda, for instance.

He also, however, wanted to lay out -- chart a course, essentially, for deepening our partnership in a range of areas where we really saw the potential for mutual benefit and common interest between the United States and Muslim-majority countries and communities.  And we, again, focused out of -- coming out of the Cairo speech on several areas that were both areas that the United States takes a particular interest in and areas that, as my colleague said, we heard back from our embassies and consulates in many Muslim-majority countries.  Their canvassing and their listening to communities found that there was great interest in cooperation on issues such as science and technology, issues such as entrepreneurship, issues such as public health and education.

So as it relates to entrepreneurship in particular, this is an issue where the United States sees entrepreneurship as an area where we have a deep amount of experience and expertise and a deep interest in fostering entrepreneurship, and it’s something that we seek to do around the world.

In this instance, given that perspective, we saw it as an area where there was great potential for the United States to increase our partnership with the Muslim-majority countries.  I think the point here is that our engagement was not deep enough in this area and so that when we assessed how the United States is engaged in many Muslim-majority countries around the world we saw a potential to increase our partnership on issues related to entrepreneurship.

So what the summit really is intended to do is to take an issue on which we work around the world and to jumpstart and deepen that engagement in Muslim-majority countries, which is why the list of participants and the countries that they come from represent those nations with Muslim majorities or large Muslim-minority populations because, again, we see this as an area to develop over an extended period of time deepening ties that will help serve the interests of those communities that are represented through their participants and serve the mutual interest of the United States and countries around the world in terms of economic growth and commerce that is fostered by entrepreneurship.

So, again, it ties very much to Cairo and the “new beginning” because it represents a deepening of cooperation in an area of mutual interest, which is entrepreneurship, and it also represents something that the United States sees as a part of our efforts around the globe related to engagement with people as well as governments, which is fostering entrepreneurship.

So, again, I'd just underscore that we see it as a win-win issue for all involved -- the participants, the countries and communities that they’re coming from, and the United States working in partnership with them.

MR. RAMAMURTHY:  Yes, I just wanted to -- the question before about access to capital was an important one, but I also wanted to just -- one final point.
Entrepreneurs need a lot of help and assistance, not just access to capital but also technical assistance is critical to them in terms of these other resources that they need, everything from putting a business plan together to establishing good financial records and accounting.  And both USAID and OPIC will be working with them on that, again, and other resources that we have.

But my final comment is I wanted to stress again the importance that we place on this as an opportunity to sort of bring people together with their American counterparts, frankly, to sort of -- as a key to strengthening our relationships with people around the world, but also unleashing new economic growth and opportunity both within the United States and in countries around the world.
MR. RHODES:  And I'd just say a couple of things.  I want to thank everybody for getting on the call.  Frankly, I think the diversity of regions represented in the media outlets we took questions from I think is positive in its own right and suggests the global nature of what we're trying to do here.

We're happy to help all of you going forward as you have questions about the summit.  We expect to be releasing a series of fact sheets, remarks and paper to supplement the summit, which will be live-streamed, so you will all have access to that even if you're not going to be here in person covering it. 

And again, I'd just underscore that we're very much looking forward to this as an opportunity -- as a step in a process of forging deeper and positive partnerships between the United States and Muslim communities around the world.  This is a priority of the President’s, which is why he included it in his Cairo speech and why he assured that there would be the follow-up on that commitment with this summit.  And we'll be continuing it going forward across our government and many, many countries around the world.

So thanks to everybody for joining the call.  And we look forward to keeping you informed about what’s taking place at the summit in the days ahead.

END
2:50 P.M. EDT